ajax at redhat.com
Wed Jun 11 16:11:15 UTC 2014
On Wed, 2014-06-11 at 17:57 +0200, Jiri Eischmann wrote:
> Reindl Harald píše v St 11. 06. 2014 v 17:44 +0200:
> > Am 11.06.2014 17:41, schrieb Jiri Eischmann:
> > > +1, we've already skipped one release and we just can't delay
> > > significantly more. Fedora is known as a fast-moving distribution. A
> > > large portion of our user base is using Fedora just for that reason. Do
> > > we really want to make even more of them switch to Arch?
> > um F20 has Kernel 3.14, recent mesa, KDE 4.13 soon, recent LibreOffice
> > and so on - what are you missing that justifies "move move, go on move!"
> Well... where do I start? For example the whole default desktop
> platform? Yes, we have GNOME 3.12 Copr, but it brings practical
> The whole graphics stack also cannot be completely rebased (it would
> require new LLVM which would be too significant change within one
No, actually, we rebase LLVM and Mesa in existing Fedora already.
xserver and the drivers are really the only bit that stay static, and
(as mentioned else-thread) that could change if we had ze vill to do so.
More information about the devel