F22 System Wide Change: Replace Yum With DNF
misc at zarb.org
Sat Jun 14 00:59:24 UTC 2014
Le vendredi 13 juin 2014 à 10:39 -0400, Steve Clark a écrit :
> On 06/13/2014 09:03 AM, drago01 wrote:
> > On Fri, Jun 13, 2014 at 2:58 PM, Reindl Harald <h.reindl at thelounge.net> wrote:
> > > Am 13.06.2014 14:53, schrieb Jan Zelený:
> > > > That being said, the reason for not renaming dnf to yum is that renaming this
> > > > project to yum will do nothing else than to confuse its users, as they will
> > > > think this is still yum and they should expect from dnf it what they expected
> > > > from yum. They should not. And dnf is not yum, I'm really sorry if you think
> > > > it is.
> > > the user expects that anyways if you replace something he
> > > did not asked for replace it and what just worked for him
> > Well there are different levels of "works" i.e just because something works that
> > something does not have to be the best possible implementation of
> > "something" ...
> > Horses worked too but at some point we decided that cars work better
> > and moved on.
> Yes but who is this better for? A few developers or the mass of people
> and documentation that
> are used to using "yum".
> With cars it was obviously better for me - dnf not so obvious.
So far in this thread, I see no one stepping to maintain yum in the long
term, just people asking to others to do it.
But having someone volunteering to maintain it would be the solution.
People who want to keep yum forever, just maintain it.
More information about the devel