Current FTBFS packages (was Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] Retiring packages for Fedora 21)

Peter Jones pjones at
Wed Jun 18 20:20:03 UTC 2014

On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 02:16:49PM -0400, Adam Jackson wrote:
> On Mon, 2014-06-09 at 14:18 -0400, Adam Jackson wrote:
> > > libguestfs uses hfsplus-tools in order to provide some HFS+ filesystem
> > > features (mainly for Mac filesystems and .DMG files).  We can remove
> > > this functionality from the Fedora version, but of course it means
> > > people won't be able to perform some operations on Mac filesystems.
> > 
> > Yeah, I'd prefer if we didn't retire hfsplus-tools too.  It'd be nice if
> > this got some attention from the arm guys, I tried to force llvm to
> > default to hard-float in 3.4-8 but it doesn't seem to have been enough
> > to fix this.  I can keep poking at it but I'm assuredly not the best man
> > for the job.
> Just to follow up on this:
> Richard added an ExcludeArch: %{arm} in Release: 7, so that fixed the
> FTBFS in a sense.  Florian Weimer, in a comment on bug 803433, offered
> to fix the source to not use clang's blocks feature (which was the only
> reason it needed clang to build), but I beat him to it.  With that, and
> another fix for arm's stdarg implementation being (righteously) pickier
> than others, Release: 8 of hfsplus-tools builds with gcc for all arches:
> If I may vent for a moment, I'd like to point out exactly how spurious
> the blocks usage was (and, implicitly, troll for code review):
> That's right kids, the C89 version is less code even _before_ you count
> the actual Blocks runtime.

And even more if all the structure for multiple event callbacks that
just isn't used were removed.  What's the point of all that?


More information about the devel mailing list