DNF: why does it refresh metadata all the time
Reindl Harald
h.reindl at thelounge.net
Fri Jun 20 12:11:45 UTC 2014
Am 20.06.2014 14:04, schrieb Tim Lauridsen:
> On Thu, Jun 19, 2014 at 8:47 PM, Dennis Gilmore <dennis at ausil.us <mailto:dennis at ausil.us>> wrote:
>
> In testing dnf on rawhide I nearly always do "dnf clean metadata && dnf update" purely because I found most of
> the time dnfs metadata was out of date. To me dnf fetching the metadata behind the scenes just doesn't work
> right. But I'm not sure that me or rawhide fits into the experience dnf is trying to give.
>
> Dennis
>
>
> Dnf-0.5.2 has a --refresh option, there will a check if the repo metadata is newer than the cached one.
>
> so.
>
> dnf update --refresh will check and update metadata if needed
*that* would be a useful default instead background-refreshes
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 246 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20140620/066c73bf/attachment.sig>
More information about the devel
mailing list