repodata - xz
pomidorabelisima at gmail.com
Fri Jun 20 18:13:00 UTC 2014
On 20.06.2014 15:44, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> On Fri, 20 Jun 2014 03:19:55 +0200
> poma <pomidorabelisima at gmail.com> wrote:
>> *filelists.sqlite.bz2 3.5 M
>> *filelists.xml.gz 3.3 M
>> *primary.sqlite.bz2 2.7 M
>> *primary.xml.gz 1.3 M
>> *other.sqlite.bz2 1.3 M
>> *other.xml.gz 964 K
>> *Fedora-20-comps.xml 906 K
>> *Fedora-20-comps.xml.gz 210 K
>> repomd.xml 3.6 K
>> *filelists.xml.gz 28 M <- xz?
>> *filelists.sqlite.xz 25 M
>> *primary.sqlite.xz 17 M
>> *primary.xml.gz 10 M <- xz?
>> *other.sqlite.xz 7.5 M
>> *other.xml.gz 5.8 M <- xz?
>> *prestodelta.xml.xz 2.9 M
>> *comps-rawhide.xml 1.6 M <- ?
>> *comps-rawhide.xml.xz 230 K
>> repomd.xml 4.2 K <- xz?
>> Why aren't all compressed with the xz, in rawhide?
>> Why two *comps* with the same original checksums?
> because thats how createrepo works. the gzipped files are not ones you
> download. yum and dnf use the sqlite files.
"because thats how createrepo works"!? :)
I'm talking in general, why not use the same improved compression for all!
I haven't mentioned an interactive, rpm based, package managers, at all. :)
But when you mention them, it is obvious that we need features and performance of the delta repodata, which is currently lacking.
Rather than listen to a dandified hullabaloo. :)
More information about the devel