dnf even allows to uninstall RPM and systemd without warnings

[Mattia Verga]

Il 23/06/2014 19:14, Gerald B. Cox ha scritto:
> <Sigh> A gun doesn't require you to go into root mode before using it; 
> and it doesn't ask you if you are sure before you pull the trigger.
>
In my example this was exactly the case. I am the root, childrens are 
users. And yes, it asks you if you're sure to pull the trigger, that's 
exactly the scope of safety lock.

> This is akin to having "Caution - May contain nuts" on a bag of 
> peanuts, "Contents may be hot" on a cup of coffee.  I guess we're now 
> suppose to assume that Fedora Users have ZERO common sense.
>
No one is fault proof.
What's wrong in trying to avoid things that can completely broke the 
system and in 99.99% will be never required by users?

If yum history showed that a protection for critical packages is useful 
and appreciated by the majority, why the yum replacement shouldn't 
implement that protection saying it's unuseful?