dnf even allows to uninstall RPM and systemd without warnings

Thomas Bendler ml at bendler-net.de
Tue Jun 24 09:45:12 UTC 2014


2014-06-24 11:36 GMT+02:00 Richard Hughes <hughsient at gmail.com>:

> On 24 June 2014 10:31, Thomas Bendler <ml at bendler-net.de> wrote:
> > you need to unlock the gun before you can shoot in your foot...
> > ...and modern systems ask you up to four, five times
>
> How many different locks does a gun have? Last time I checked there
> was one safety catch -- DNF asks you for 'y/N' confirmation with a
>

​Three safety locks the last time I used it. After inserting the magazine I
had to load the bullet first, then I had to unlock the gun and then I had
to pull the trigger. I don't think that this procedure happens accidentally.
​

> HUGE list of packages to be removed. If you're not sure whether
> removing systemd or glibc is a bad idea, perhaps having root access
> isn't the best plan in the world. There are _so_ _many_ _ways_ to hose
> your system with root access, I really don't think we can or should
> baby-proof just one low level command.
>

​Because you don't think about it dosen't mean others think about it. If
you build scripts that provision systems after minimal install, doing
thinks like yum -y update, reboot and do cleanup like yum -y remove kernel,
it works fine with yum but completely crash your system with DNF. Of
course, you can wrap around this ​and build you own checks, but why should
the checks be implemented in the scripts if the current update manager
already provide this kind of checks and features?

Regards Thomas
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20140624/0c67ce93/attachment.html>


More information about the devel mailing list