Patches for trivial bugs sitting in bugzilla -> trivial patch policy?

[Kevin Fenzi]

On Thu, 26 Jun 2014 17:17:07 +0100
Richard Hughes <hughsient at gmail.com> wrote:

> On 26 June 2014 17:02, Simone Caronni <negativo17 at gmail.com> wrote:
> > +1 from me!
> 
> If it's a trivial patch then I think it makes sense to just do it.
> From someone that touches hundreds of different projects every month,
> I've found it's better to ask forgiveness than permission :)

Yeah, but the proposal is talking about when someone is not a
provenpackager and doesn't have permissions to just apply them. ;( 

I'm not sure the entire group of provenpackagers would like to be
notified of such trivial patches waiting. Is there a group of
provenpackagers who would be willing to query for and apply these?

Another idea that leaps to mind is to add more provenpackagers... 
have we set the bar too high so no one wants to apply?

kevin
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20140626/78cd62fd/attachment.sig>