Patches for trivial bugs sitting in bugzilla -> trivial patch policy?
manisandro at gmail.com
Thu Jun 26 16:46:57 UTC 2014
On 26.06.2014 18:42, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Thu, 26 Jun 2014 17:17:07 +0100
> Richard Hughes <hughsient at gmail.com> wrote:
>> On 26 June 2014 17:02, Simone Caronni <negativo17 at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> +1 from me!
>> If it's a trivial patch then I think it makes sense to just do it.
>> From someone that touches hundreds of different projects every month,
>> I've found it's better to ask forgiveness than permission :)
> Yeah, but the proposal is talking about when someone is not a
> provenpackager and doesn't have permissions to just apply them. ;(
> I'm not sure the entire group of provenpackagers would like to be
> notified of such trivial patches waiting. Is there a group of
> provenpackagers who would be willing to query for and apply these?
I'd assume it would be a group of packagers who would volunteer to do
so. Just to be clear: I'm not a proven packager at this time, but since
I'm proposing this I'd obviously also be happy to help out.
> Another idea that leaps to mind is to add more provenpackagers...
> have we set the bar too high so no one wants to apply?
I guess unless you don't have a real reason to do so (i.e. don't work on
packages which can influence many other components of the distribution),
you don't see an immediate reason to.
More information about the devel