Patches for trivial bugs sitting in bugzilla -> trivial patch policy?

Yaakov Selkowitz yselkowi at redhat.com
Thu Jun 26 18:01:05 UTC 2014


On 2014-06-26 11:17, Richard Hughes wrote:
> On 26 June 2014 17:02, Simone Caronni <negativo17 at gmail.com> wrote:
>> +1 from me!
>
> If it's a trivial patch then I think it makes sense to just do it.
>  From someone that touches hundreds of different projects every month,
> I've found it's better to ask forgiveness than permission :)

As previously stated, that only works if you are a provenpackager.  The 
question is for those of us who are not, but are trying to help.

This seems to be particularly needed around mass rebuilds, which IMHO 
should be an "all-hands-on-deck" time.  For example, I've been going 
through the sizable F21FTBFS list[1][2], looking for arm-specific bugs 
and fixing what else I can along the way.  So far most of my ~100 
patches are just bitrotting in bugzilla, while branching is less than 
two weeks away.

As a newcomer to Fedora development, is there something else I should 
doing to get these patches reviewed and committed?


Yaakov Selkowitz

[1] http://ausil.fedorapeople.org/f21-failures.html
[2] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1105908



More information about the devel mailing list