Patches for trivial bugs sitting in bugzilla -> trivial patch policy?

[Mukundan Ragavan]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512


I think having a "trivial patch" policy and proven packager route of
implementation is a great idea!

On 06/26/2014 11:42 AM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> provenpackagers who would be willing to query for and apply these?
> 
> Another idea that leaps to mind is to add more provenpackagers... 
> have we set the bar too high so no one wants to apply?
> 

Isn't it best for the project as a whole to have the bar for proven
packager high? :)

Mukundan.

- -- 
GPG key-ID: 00E8658D
====================
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux)
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=FOGa
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----