Patches for trivial bugs sitting in bugzilla -> trivial patch policy?

Yaakov Selkowitz yselkowi at
Thu Jun 26 22:53:08 UTC 2014

On 2014-06-26 15:33, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Thu, 26 Jun 2014 13:01:05 -0500 Yaakov Selkowitz wrote:
>> This seems to be particularly needed around mass rebuilds, which IMHO
>> should be an "all-hands-on-deck" time.  For example, I've been going
>> through the sizable F21FTBFS list[1][2], looking for arm-specific
>> bugs and fixing what else I can along the way.  So far most of my
>> ~100 patches are just bitrotting in bugzilla, while branching is less
>> than two weeks away.
>> As a newcomer to Fedora development, is there something else I should
>> doing to get these patches reviewed and committed?
> I'm pretty swamped, but I'm happy to go through them as time permits
> and help apply/build them.
> I assume they are attached to each of the FTBFS bugs?

Or to the previously reported bugs (usually -Werror=format-security), 
upon which they are now marked as dependent.  I tested the patches with 
mock before posting.

Here are my unreviewed patches from last week or earlier, oldest to newest:

> If other provenpackgers have time it would be great to apply these
> before branching.


Yaakov Selkowitz

More information about the devel mailing list