Patches for trivial bugs sitting in bugzilla -> trivial patch policy?
metherid at gmail.com
Fri Jun 27 15:50:16 UTC 2014
On Fri, Jun 27, 2014 at 11:36 AM, Yaakov Selkowitz wrote:
> On 2014-06-27 10:17, Till Maas wrote:
>> Yes, I missed this as well. Also IIRC the guidelines demand an patch
>> status comment for each patch in the spec file, so just adding patch
>> without noting why it is not upstreamable or information about when/how
>> it was upstreamed is bad and should IMHO not be done by provenpackagers.
> When patching others' code, I generally follow the existing style; I can
> tell you that *many* packages don't have these patch comments. Thanks for
> bringing this to my attention.
The guidelines don't demand it but it is recommended
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the devel