Patches for trivial bugs sitting in bugzilla -> trivial patch policy?
Ralf Corsepius
rc040203 at freenet.de
Fri Jun 27 15:55:41 UTC 2014
On 06/27/2014 05:17 PM, Till Maas wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 27, 2014 at 10:05:31AM +0200, Dan HorĂ¡k wrote:
>
>> oh, that's an impressive list, but I would like see to one more thing
>> there - links to upstream bug reports where relevant (eg. fixing
>> configure stuff), because we usually need them fixed in upstreams too
>
> Yes, I missed this as well. Also IIRC the guidelines demand an patch
> status comment for each patch in the spec file, so just adding patch
> without noting why it is not upstreamable or information about when/how
> it was upstreamed is bad and should IMHO not be done by provenpackagers.
As in many cases before, I once more have to disagree with you, because
this approach is not applicable in many cases nor helpful to Fedora and
its users.
Ralf
More information about the devel
mailing list