delta rpms - can we turn them off

[Kevin Fenzi]

On Fri, 27 Jun 2014 19:18:15 +0200
drago01 <drago01 at gmail.com> wrote:

> On Fri, Jun 27, 2014 at 7:13 PM, Kevin Fenzi <kevin at scrye.com> wrote:
> > On Fri, 27 Jun 2014 19:11:53 +0200
> > drago01 <drago01 at gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >> That wasn't about "poor" as in slow vs. "great" as in fast but
> >> bandwith capped vs. not.
> >>
> >> If building deltas are slow the solution is not to disable them
> >> but to find out why there are slow and fix that. One thing for
> >> instance is that it insists on generating the original rpm while
> >> creating an uncompressed rpm would save a compress + uncompressed
> >> cycle during updates (the former is a bit extensive for xz).
> >
> > I think It could avoid doing that if people didn't mind that it
> > couldn't be gpg checked.
> 
> Well the delta files themselves could be signed no?

I do not think that would work, no. 

kevin
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20140627/acd95b1d/attachment.sig>