Patches for trivial bugs sitting in bugzilla -> trivial patch policy?

[drago01]

On Thu, Jun 26, 2014 at 10:27 PM, Mukundan Ragavan
<nonamedotc at fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA512
>
>
> I think having a "trivial patch" policy and proven packager route of
> implementation is a great idea!
>
> On 06/26/2014 11:42 AM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>> provenpackagers who would be willing to query for and apply these?
>>
>> Another idea that leaps to mind is to add more provenpackagers...
>> have we set the bar too high so no one wants to apply?
>>
>
> Isn't it best for the project as a whole to have the bar for proven
> packager high? :)

No its very harmful. It drives contributors away because they cannot
.. well contribute.