Patches for trivial bugs sitting in bugzilla -> trivial patch policy?

Reindl Harald h.reindl at thelounge.net
Mon Jun 30 17:12:06 UTC 2014


Am 30.06.2014 19:06, schrieb Till Maas:
> On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 12:54:42PM -0400, Josh Boyer wrote:
>> On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 12:37 PM, Till Maas <opensource at till.name> wrote:
>>> On Fri, Jun 27, 2014 at 05:55:41PM +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
>>>
>>>> As in many cases before, I once more have to disagree with you, because this
>>>
>>> Please refrain from personal attacks and note the Fedora code of
>>> conduct:
>>> https://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
>>
>> Ralf didn't attack you personally or otherwise.  He disagreed with
>> you.  Disagreement is common place and honestly his phrasing was
>> perfectly acceptable.
> 
> If he just writes that he disagrees with me, I agree with you. But
> highlighting that he disagreed with me many times in the past is
> personal and has no relevance to whether or not comments should be added
> to patches in SPEC files.

but it remains *far away* from personal attacks
if people want to be insulted they will find a reason....

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 246 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20140630/4e045761/attachment.sig>


More information about the devel mailing list