fedora-release-$PRODUCT, /etc/issue, /etc/os-release, Per-Product Configs and more!

Lennart Poettering mzerqung at 0pointer.de
Mon Jun 30 20:22:14 UTC 2014


On Mon, 30.06.14 16:16, Stephen Gallagher (sgallagh at redhat.com) wrote:

> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> 
> On 06/30/2014 04:10 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> > On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 03:44:26PM -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> >> Any chance that systemd wants to build a hostnamectl-like
> >> interface for setting the os-release values? That would make life
> >> a lot easier on us, as we could reconfigure that file if-and-when
> >> a fedora-release-$PRODUCT package was installed in a %post
> >> snippet.
> > What would be the advantage over including /usr/lib/os-release in
> > the package directly? What kinds of fields could be modified in
> > this way?
> > 
> Well, ideally we'd like the majority of the file to be owned by
> fedora-release and then just add the one or two additional fields
> specific to the products programmatically.
> 
> I suppose though that we could just carry complete duplicates in each
> fedora-release-* package. Particularly if we end up adding a
> fedora-release-nonproduct (or however we name it) package to solve the
> depsolving issues as suggested by James Antill.

I really don't understand why /usr/lib/os-release should have an API to
modify. It describes the vendor operating system image, really, and his
hence strictly not dynamic. We should never invent mechanisms that make
files in /usr subject to runtime configuration. That would be completely
backwards.

Lennart

-- 
Lennart Poettering, Red Hat


More information about the devel mailing list