default file system, was: Comparison to Workstation Technical Specification

Reindl Harald h.reindl at thelounge.net
Sat Mar 1 15:43:52 UTC 2014



Am 01.03.2014 16:42, schrieb Orion Poplawski:
> On 03/01/2014 05:04 AM, Ian Malone wrote:
>>
>> As you say they are 'plain' filesystems. Though I now regret not
>> sending my small datapoint in before the Server WG decision. That's
>> that a while ago, after using XFS for a long time we started putting
>> new filesystems onto ext4 and in the past month we moved probably our
>> largest remaining dataset (1.1TB) from XFS to ext4, the main reason
>> has been flexibility with resizing. Particularly the XFS 32bit inode
>> ceiling, (inode64 not working well with NFS).
> 
> Could you speak more to the inode64/NFS issue?

https://www.google.com/search?q=inode64+nfs

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 246 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20140301/08953b30/attachment.sig>


More information about the devel mailing list