default file system, was: Comparison to Workstation Technical Specification

[Eric Sandeen]

On 3/3/14, 7:34 PM, Chris Adams wrote:
> Once upon a time, Eric Sandeen <sandeen at redhat.com> said:
>> The shrink/grow thing was clever, but also a bit abusive from a filesystem
>> design point of view.
> 
> How does it compare to the suggested alternative, LVM thin provisioning?
> How well does thinp handle fragmentation; is there a "defrag" for thinp
> available (or planned)?

Well, I meant that it was clever for the minimal root fs distribution
business.

But I think you're right, fragmentation on thinp is something that is
still under investigation.  

-Eric