exclude people from giving karma?

[Reindl Harald]

Am 10.03.2014 20:18, schrieb drago01:
> On Sun, Feb 23, 2014 at 6:12 PM, Reindl Harald <h.reindl at thelounge.net> wrote:
>> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-2922/libreoffice-4.2.1.1-1.fc20?_csrf_token=a6a024f6e2d35ad3f3333b8666c1244e215a6aa2
>>
>> how can people pretend "installation went smoothly, no issue detected during basic
>> document manipulation" for packages which are not installable at all due
>> dependencie problems?
> 
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/mesa-10.0.3-1.20140206.fc20
> ... again broken dep and someone gave it +1 regardless.  You should
> know that "someone" very well ;)
> 
> Now seriously auto qa detected the broken dep. Maybe it should give
> negative karma even if there are false positives a wrong negative
> karma is not the end of the world ...

yes i know that one well, that's why that one notified
here that rebuilds are needed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1066718

the difference is:

* that packages install and are running here the whole day
* now downloads from other builds required
* the openoffice one did *not* install from the build alone
  in no case at all

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 246 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20140310/689e5f97/attachment.sig>