Per-Product Config file divergence

[Adam Williamson]

On Mon, 2014-03-10 at 11:31 -0700, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:

> > And I think those subpackages probably _should_ conflict, don't you?
> >
> 
> Depends.  Sgallagh had a desire to mark that a particular system
> implemented multiple products (ie server that also had workstation
> installed).  I'm not sure that's a good idea but if we did go that route
> then we'd have to be able to support that with our identifiers.
> Subpackages that conflict wouldn't be flexible enough to handle that.

Just for the more-public-record, I remain pretty sure this is a bad idea
and don't think we should allow it. You should always be considered to
be running exactly 0 or 1 Products. I think we should consider how to
allow things like 'run a desktop on the Server product', but that
shouldn't be conceived as 'run Workstation on Server'.
-- 
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net
http://www.happyassassin.net