exclude people from giving karma?

[Adam Williamson]

On Mon, 2014-03-10 at 20:40 +0100, drago01 wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 8:35 PM, Reindl Harald <h.reindl at thelounge.net> wrote:
> >
> >
> > Am 10.03.2014 20:18, schrieb drago01:
> >> On Sun, Feb 23, 2014 at 6:12 PM, Reindl Harald <h.reindl at thelounge.net> wrote:
> >>> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-2922/libreoffice-4.2.1.1-1.fc20?_csrf_token=a6a024f6e2d35ad3f3333b8666c1244e215a6aa2
> >>>
> >>> how can people pretend "installation went smoothly, no issue detected during basic
> >>> document manipulation" for packages which are not installable at all due
> >>> dependencie problems?
> >>
> >> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/mesa-10.0.3-1.20140206.fc20
> >> ... again broken dep and someone gave it +1 regardless.  You should
> >> know that "someone" very well ;)
> >>
> >> Now seriously auto qa detected the broken dep. Maybe it should give
> >> negative karma even if there are false positives a wrong negative
> >> karma is not the end of the world ...
> >
> > yes i know that one well, that's why that one notified
> > here that rebuilds are needed
> > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1066718
> 
> OK, but then you should undo your +1 by adding a -1 (which means 0
> instead of +1).

No, it doesn't. only you last non-zero value is considered. if you file
a +1 then a -1, you're counted as -1. If you file a -1 then a +1, you're
counted as +1.

There is no current way to change -1 or +1 to 0, which is obviously a
missing feature.
-- 
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net
http://www.happyassassin.net