Heads up: Mesa/LLVM rebase and OpenGTL retirement in F20

[Adam Jackson]

On Fri, 2014-03-28 at 07:39 -0400, Jaroslav Reznik wrote:

> +1
> 
> And yep, it should go to FESCo - this has much more bigger scope than 10.0.3
> due to LLVM update. You know I'm more than ok with updates to Fn-1 but this
> one should be coordinated very well.

Can you (or anyone else) elaborate on the issues you're concerned with
here?  If I'm going to have to play Simon Says about this I'd like some
opportunity to address (or at least investigate) concerns ahead of time.

- ajax