Incorrect order of /usr/bin and /usr/sbin in path

[Reindl Harald]

Am 05.05.2014 22:19, schrieb Simo Sorce:
> On Mon, 2014-05-05 at 22:03 +0200, Kay Sievers wrote:
>> On Mon, May 5, 2014 at 9:52 PM, Reindl Harald <h.reindl at thelounge.net> wrote:
>>> Am 05.05.2014 21:45, schrieb Kay Sievers:
>>>> On Mon, May 5, 2014 at 6:15 PM, Matthew Miller <mattdm at fedoraproject.org> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> And calling /usr/libexec "Fedora-only" is of course kind of
>>>>> funny.
>>>>
>>>> "libexec" is Fedora-only, no other major distro used it, not even LSB
>>>> allowed it.
>>
>>> you systemd-guys are really funny - /run was okay and FHS did
>>> not matter because it don't get often enough updates and was in
>>> your way, libexec is not OK because you don't like itand prefer
>>> to fix things which ain't broken - wheter it's part of a proposed
>>> FHS update and from where it comes
>>
>> It is not about being funny, it is about making reasonable decisions.
>> /run solved a huge old problem, libexec is pointless and only creates
>> needless and nothing but annoying differences.
> 
> It's a practical way to keep helpers out of path and autocomplete
> without polluting /usr/lib[64] and having to deal with multilib issues,
> what's pointless about it?

that it was not proposed by systemd-upstream

(sorry could not resist)

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 246 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20140505/a0827844/attachment.sig>