pvm packaging guidelines violations?

[Kevin Kofler]

Susi Lehtola wrote:

> Richard Shaw wrote:
>> 2. Should this package go through a re-review?
> 
> Not according to the policy, no.
> 
> The package has been in Fedora the whole time, and the maintainers are
> supposed to keep the spec files up-to-date with Fedora policies.

It was supposed to go through a merge review (during the Core-Extras Merge), 
the one that was inappropriately closed without the packaging issues getting 
resolved.

The policy was supposed to be that packages that do not pass the merge 
review get removed. This was just never enforced.

        Kevin Kofler