LLVM 3.5 rebase

[drago01]

On Fri, Nov 7, 2014 at 2:51 AM, Jens Petersen <petersen at redhat.com> wrote:
>> That's only going to work if llvm34 renames all of its binaries, and ghc
>> is changed to invoke the renamed ones, right?  Otherwise the 3.4 and 3.5
>> versions of /usr/bin/llc will conflict.
>
> Hmm yes I guess I should go the whole way...
>
> My initial lazy plan was just that ghc-compiler.armv7hl
> should require and BR llvm34 instead of llvm (and make llvm34
> Conflicts with llvm and llvm34-devel conflicts with llvm-devel...).
>
> Not sure how many people really need both (on arm),
> but I suppose it is better to avoid conflict where possible.

Well mesa depends on llvm so that sounds like not really practical.