downgrade version of gthumb in fedora 21 final?

Stephen Gallagher sgallagh at
Fri Nov 7 14:24:01 UTC 2014

On Fri, 2014-11-07 at 08:52 +0000, Richard Hughes wrote:
> On 7 November 2014 00:31, Michael Catanzaro <mcatanzaro at> wrote:
> > Since gthumb does not follow the GNOME release schedule, we
> > shouldn't push unstable versions of gthumb to rawhide.
> No? We push unstable GNOME to rawhide all the time; or is this more of
> a case where we're worrying that a stable gthumb won't be available
> before F22 is due?

The original email was talking about F21. Seems pretty unlikely that it
will happen in time, so we need a downgrade (and epoch bump)
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 181 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <>

More information about the devel mailing list