How to handle upgrades to Fedora 21

[Michael Catanzaro]

On Fri, 2014-10-03 at 19:37 -0400, Ray Strode wrote:
> I'm not sure it's worth repainting the bikeshed at this point, but
> during the alluded-to discussion a few alternative names came up that
> would have been better than fedora-release-standard:
> 
> 1) fedora-release-nonstandard

That this was the first item on the list suggests that
fedora-release-standard is not the right name. :) In fact, most of the
names on your list are antonyms of "standard."

> 3) fedora-release-diy

Not a good name for spins. This sounds like Gentoo.

> 4) fedora-release-noncompliant

This one makes it sound like not running a product is a bad thing. Let's
avoid this one.

All the other names are fine. I still like fedora-release-generic the
best. My favorite color of paint is Myrtle Green. It's a nice color. [1]

Michael

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shades_of_green#Myrtle_green
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 473 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20141004/45ae5dff/attachment.sig>