btrfs as default filesystem for F22?
josef at toxicpanda.com
Tue Oct 7 18:24:21 UTC 2014
On Tue, Oct 7, 2014 at 2:05 PM, Matthias Clasen <mclasen at redhat.com> wrote:
> On Tue, 2014-10-07 at 13:24 -0400, Josh Boyer wrote:
>> On Tue, Oct 7, 2014 at 1:19 PM, Gerald B. Cox <gbcox at bzb.us> wrote:
>> > Thanks James... I am aware of all the warnings. They might as well put up a
>> > skull & crossbones. I have all my data backed up twice. But this is my
>> > point... you don't say toxic and then simultaneously talk about proposing it
>> > as the default file system on Fedora.
>> Right... no single person is saying both things. We don't have
>> split-personality disorder here. Someone started discussing it as
>> default, and a bunch of other people chimed in that it wasn't ready.
>> Until those concerns are dealt with, it's not really even a candidate
>> for default consideration.
> I think the point is somewhat valid though. To just keep repeating the
> mantra 'its not ready' is not going to make it any more ready. If suse
> can identify a stable subset of btrfs features and use it as their
> default file system with those restrictions, why can't we do the same ?
> The approach makes sense to me, at least...
Because they still have the support staff for when users don't listen,
Fedora doesn't. Thanks,
More information about the devel