[Test-Announce] Taskotron Has Replaced AutoQA
tflink at redhat.com
Wed Oct 15 15:17:20 UTC 2014
On Tue, 14 Oct 2014 21:10:26 +0200
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek <zbyszek at in.waw.pl> wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 14, 2014 at 04:28:33AM -0400, Martin Krizek wrote:
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: "Vít Ondruch" <vondruch at redhat.com>
> > > To: devel at lists.fedoraproject.org
> > > Sent: Tuesday, October 14, 2014 8:57:26 AM
> > > Subject: Re: [Test-Announce] Taskotron Has Replaced AutoQA
> > >
> > > You have not mentioned URL of Taskotron here nor the Wiki is
> > > updated to contain the link to the production version of
> > > Taskotron.
> > >
> > > Vít
> > https://taskotron.fedoraproject.org/
> This says "Taskotron is in the very early stages of development with
> the objective to replace AutoQA for automating selected QA tasks in
> Fedora.", which doesn't seem to be true anymore.
Thanks for pointing that out, I'll get it updated soon (today if my
freeze break request is approved).
> taskotron-dev.fedoraproject.org uses an invalid security certificate.
> The certificate is not trusted because no issuer chain was provided.
> The certificate is only valid for taskotron-dev01.qa.fedoraproject.org
That stems from two things: first is that the actual hostname of the
machine responding to http requests doesn't match the public-facing
hostname (this is true of almost all infra hosts). For the self-signed
cert bit, as far as I know, most fedora app dev instances are using
self-signed certs. It doesn't make a whole lot of sense to me to pay
for a real SSL cert on a dev instance - especially when it would mean
having individual certs on every dev instance (there's no central proxy
Both stg and production are using proper SSL certs, though.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 473 bytes
Desc: not available
More information about the devel