LLVM 3.5 rebase
sergio.pasra at gmail.com
Fri Oct 17 17:16:07 UTC 2014
2014-10-17 16:00 GMT+02:00 Peter Robinson <pbrobinson at gmail.com>:
> On Fri, Oct 17, 2014 at 2:56 PM, Adam Jackson <ajax at redhat.com> wrote:
> > Yep, this again. I'm just as thrilled as you are. 3.5 is necessary for
> > proper ppc64le support, as well as some minor radeonsi features in Mesa.
> And massively improved aarch64 support
> > One problem this time around appears to be python-llvmpy, which appears
> > to have decided that llvm 3.2/3.3 are the only versions it will support:
> > We're already shipping it built against 3.4, so that's truly charming.
> > I'm open to suggestions here.
> It doesn't look, with a basic repoquery test, that anything in the
> core distro needs python-llvmpy so my general feeling is to query
> upstream to see what their intentions are regarding support of newer
> releases and if they don't intend to keep up then just drop
> python-llvmpy at least for the time being unless the Fedora maintainer
> plans to fix it RSN.
I initially had intentions to package numba, and other pyhton goodies that
on python-llvmpy, but I haven't worked on it on a very long time.
So I'm OK with retiring python-llvmpy if a patch doesn't appear soon.
in the tracking bug for 3.5
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the devel