No more deltarpms by default

Reindl Harald h.reindl at thelounge.net
Fri Oct 17 18:10:49 UTC 2014


Am 17.10.2014 um 19:45 schrieb drago01:
> 1) deltarpms -> low bandwidth use but takes a while to apply the updates
> 2) no deltarpms -> high bandwidth use but faster updates application.
>
> So now people suggest the user (or the distro) has to either choose 1) or 2) ...
> What I am suggesting is adding a third option:
>
> 3) Use less bandwidth *and* apply updates fast (by fixing deltarpm).
> So if we have 3) the choice between 1) and 2) does not make much sense

but we *do not have* option 3 without change fundamentally how things 
are implemented, so yes - it would be fine - but decisions are already 
made by what we *have now* by *disable* it as default

so just stop arguing in theory when the topic is about what is possible

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 181 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20141017/5646c341/attachment.sig>


More information about the devel mailing list