LLVM 3.5 rebase
kyle at redhat.com
Mon Oct 20 14:45:00 UTC 2014
On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 10:19:16AM -0400, Adam Jackson wrote:
> On Fri, 2014-10-17 at 19:16 +0200, Sergio Pascual wrote:
> > 2014-10-17 16:00 GMT+02:00 Peter Robinson <pbrobinson at gmail.com>:
> > So I'm OK with retiring python-llvmpy if a patch doesn't appear soon.
> I would be too, but I'm going to want 3.5 in F21, and we have this whole
> thing about not retiring packages in a live release.
> Perhaps I should just barge ahead with a compat-llvm34?
i can take a look at llvmpy this week, but i'd recommend just retiring
it otherwise. it can come back if it has to.
More information about the devel