'Branch freeze policy' and 'Change deadline' naming change proposal
adamwill at fedoraproject.org
Wed Sep 24 19:41:17 UTC 2014
I'm currently like two months behind on devel@ - apologies if I've
missed anything relevant.
A discussion in #anaconda this morning made it clear that folks have
trouble following our full release cycle, and particularly the various
kinds of 'freeze' that exist.
So, there is a page named "Branch freeze policy":
which is marked as deprecated, and hasn't been linked to in the wiki
Releases/XX/Schedule pages since F18. However, I can't for the life of
me see any way in which it is in fact inaccurate, and it doesn't seem to
have been replaced with anything. So far as I can see it still
accurately describes the process we follow.
AFAICS, the "Branch freeze" kicks in at the point we enable Bodhi on the
Branched tree, which is usually a couple of weeks after forking it from
Rawhide. For instance, on the F21 schedule -
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/21/Schedule - "Branch Fedora 21
from Rawhide" is listed on 2014-07-08. The first 'Fedora 21
updates-testing' email I have is dated 2014-08-28, so I'd say the
schedule should have had an extra row, "Branch Freeze", dated
2014-08-28. (The period between branching and enabling Bodhi was
unusually long for F21).
The name "Branch freeze" seems unfortunate to me, however, as it's not
really a freeze, it's more of a light cooling. I'd suggest we remove the
'deprecation' notice, update any details on the page which are no longer
correct if anyone can see any, and rename it. Ideas:
Branch update policy enforcement
anyone got anything better?
So, the second part of the process which is apparently causing trouble
is the "Change Deadlines". These, again, seem to be something of a
misnomer, because the Change Deadlines are the *actual* freezes. The
problem is exacerbated by the renaming of 'Features' to 'Changes'. If
you look again at the F21 schedule you'll see that it lists "Change
Proposals Submission Deadline", "Changes Freeze", some "milestone Change
Deadlines", and "Accepted Changes 100% Complete" - but those items are
referring to two entirely *different* things when they use the word
"Change". This is clearly unfortunate.
Again, I'd recommend a renaming here. If we call the "Branch freeze"
something else then we can simply call those points the "Alpha Freeze",
"Beta Freeze" and "Final Freeze", which are the terms used informally in
any case, and would line up with the "freeze exception policy" which
determines what stuff can break those freezes.
Along with the renaming I'd like to work over the documentation a bit so
all the relevant pages link up and sing from the same hymn sheet, but I
can actually do that right now, orthogonal to the renaming, without
really needing any review, so I'll just go do it. (I'll post a reply
explaining what I did in a bit).
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net
More information about the devel