review or review swap for spooky-c?

Jeff Layton jlayton at poochiereds.net
Wed Apr 1 15:47:22 UTC 2015


On Wed, 1 Apr 2015 16:16:25 +0100
Jonathan Underwood <jonathan.underwood at gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi Jeff,
> 
> On 1 April 2015 at 16:00, Jeff Layton <jlayton at poochiereds.net> wrote:
> > I'm trying to get this library added to Fedora. It's quite small and
> > the code is public domain:
> >
> >     https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1205376
> >
> > An unsponsored reviewer has already had a look and I've addressed his
> > comments, but I need someone who can officially review it.
> 
> 
> It's good practice to repost the Spec: <url> and SRPM: <url> with each
> update to the package so that fedora-review will work correctly given
> the review BZ number. Not doing so doesn't lend your package to prompt
> review :). Also, you should certainly address the last point raised in
> the BZ ticket about github sources.

Thanks for taking a look. I've updated the package in accordance with
github source generation. If you or anyone else can help review this,
it'd be greatly appreciated:

    https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1205376#c9

Thanks!
-- 
Jeff Layton <jlayton at poochiereds.net>


More information about the devel mailing list