review or review swap for spooky-c?
Jeff Layton
jlayton at poochiereds.net
Wed Apr 1 15:47:22 UTC 2015
On Wed, 1 Apr 2015 16:16:25 +0100
Jonathan Underwood <jonathan.underwood at gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Jeff,
>
> On 1 April 2015 at 16:00, Jeff Layton <jlayton at poochiereds.net> wrote:
> > I'm trying to get this library added to Fedora. It's quite small and
> > the code is public domain:
> >
> > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1205376
> >
> > An unsponsored reviewer has already had a look and I've addressed his
> > comments, but I need someone who can officially review it.
>
>
> It's good practice to repost the Spec: <url> and SRPM: <url> with each
> update to the package so that fedora-review will work correctly given
> the review BZ number. Not doing so doesn't lend your package to prompt
> review :). Also, you should certainly address the last point raised in
> the BZ ticket about github sources.
Thanks for taking a look. I've updated the package in accordance with
github source generation. If you or anyone else can help review this,
it'd be greatly appreciated:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1205376#c9
Thanks!
--
Jeff Layton <jlayton at poochiereds.net>
More information about the devel
mailing list