"Your Outstanding Requests" on closed bugs

[Adam Williamson]

On Wed, 2015-04-01 at 13:56 -0400, Miloslav Trmač wrote:
> > Humans I can
> > understand having different views, but the tools should provide 
> > the humans with
> > what we need here.  In this case I think that means one of the 
> > following:
> > 
> > 1) Require that the bot ignore bugs that are closed (assuming a 
> > majority
> > consensus agrees, which I understand isn't likely to happen)
> > 
> > 2) Require that the bot be configurable by individuals to 
> > optionally ignore
> > (1)
> 
> Surely the right thing is to not have any “unreviewed” patches in a 
> closed bug by the time the bug is closed.  (New unreviewed patches 
> could arrive after the bug has been closed, same as new comments, 
> but that is AFAICS not the situation prompting this thread.)  
> Ignoring the inconsistent state of unreviewed patches in a closed 
> bug is at best a band-aid.
> 
> If we modify bugzilla at all, I would suggest to modify it as to 
> resolve the review flags in patches while closing a bug (by marking 
> them as reviewed, as refused, by dropping the review=? flags, or 
> perhaps by saking).

The mails do not just cover patch review. They cover the 'needinfo' 
state as well: you get a reminder for any bug which has a 'needinfo' 
flag set for you.
-- 
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net
http://www.happyassassin.net