dnf replacing yum and dnf-yum

[Reindl Harald]

Am 07.04.2015 um 19:08 schrieb Bruno Wolff III:
> On Tue, Apr 07, 2015 at 18:55:38 +0200,
>   Reindl Harald <h.reindl at thelounge.net> wrote:
>>
>> it masks the existence of a security update with broken deps and we
>> *really* don't need another flamewar thread - it is a bad attitude to
>> make such options the default
>
> I think it's much more likely there is a good security update available
> but a broken update for some other package which would block doing the
> security update in the absence of the skip broken feature.
>
> Skip broken isn't going to have that much effect on not noticing that a
> security update is broken. There are other tools for helping with that
> when the brokenness is contained within Fedora

jesus chirst it *does not matter* what is more or less likely

burry errors is *wrong* in any case and there is also a world outside 
"within fedora" and the Fedora repos itself

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 181 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20150407/672786d9/attachment.sig>