dnf replacing yum and dnf-yum

[Josef Stribny]

> none of such soname changes should happen there

Exactly, it should not. I think this is a mistake of the maintainer and
not Fedora. I certainly think twice about my Fedora updates.

J.

----- Original Message -----
From: "Marcin Juszkiewicz" <mjuszkiewicz at redhat.com>
To: devel at lists.fedoraproject.org
Sent: Friday, April 10, 2015 4:24:38 PM
Subject: Re: dnf replacing yum and dnf-yum

W dniu 10.04.2015 o 12:46, Ralf Corsepius pisze:
> Just think about what recently has happened this week in F21:
> (probably unnoticed to the fast majority of users): Somebody pushed
> an SONAME-changing/ABI-braking update to cloog, cloog-ppl, isl.
> 
> This broke all packages which were depending the old libcloog.so. 
> Seemingly there weren't any in Fedora, but 3rd party repos may carry
> such.

And magically that became DNF issue? Such fuckup (sorry, but there is no
better word) is rather example of bad package repo management. F21 is
RELEASED version - none of such soname changes should happen there.

I know, I came from Debian/Ubuntu world where things are done in other
way but a way how Fedora is developed AFTER it gets released scares me
too often.
-- 
devel mailing list
devel at lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct