Moving Docker image under Cloud edition?

[Joe Brockmeier]

On 04/09/2015 02:37 PM, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
> On Thursday, April 09, 2015 12:07:55 PM Joe Brockmeier wrote:
>> On 04/08/2015 06:41 PM, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
>>> the docker base image is part of the Base WG. so it seems wrong to put it
>>> on the Cloud page,  but we should do something to advertise it more.
>>
>> But there's no Base WG page or anything... I know it's sitting there
>> now, but I don't think end users care about which working group does it.
>>
>> Conceptually, it seems to me to fit with Cloud. Other suggestions welcome.
>>
>> I'm also curious whether there should be some closer collaboration
>> between base wg and cloud on the container image(s)?
> 
> there probably should be closer collaboration, it started under the cloud WG 
> and was moved to the Base WG. I do not really mind where it sits, but it 
> should not go flip flopping.

OK. And apologies for contributing to that, but we're all still figuring
things out there.

I suppose the best answer for now is to ride out the F22 release as-is
and see about changing for F23 and forward?

Best,

jzb
-- 
Joe Brockmeier | Principal Cloud & Storage Analyst
jzb at redhat.com | http://community.redhat.com/
Twitter: @jzb  | http://dissociatedpress.net/

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 473 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20150413/342c15db/attachment.sig>