Fwd: Why Isn't NFS Working?

[Kelly Miller]

No, it isn't.

On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 5:22 AM, Benjamin Coddington <bcodding at redhat.com>
wrote:

> On Mon, 13 Apr 2015, Kelly Miller wrote:
>
> > I managed to figure it out.  nfs-lock doesn't seem to be starting through
> > systemd, and I'm not sure why.  I can start it using start manually, but
> > when I try to enable it to start on system load, it claims "No file or
> > directory".
>
> That sounds like it might this problem:
>
> 'rpc-statd won't start for user mounts'
> http://marc.info/?t=142314313000002&r=1&w=2
>
> Except that the error message is a bit different..
>
> Is this a user mount?
>
> Ben
>
> > On Mon, Apr 13, 2015 at 6:15 PM, Kelly Miller <lightsolphoenix at
> gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Let's see...
> > > The server is CentOS 6.  There's nothing fancy about the setup; rather
> > > than running an account sync like NIS or LDAP, I just make sure that
> both
> > > computers have the same users with the same user id's on both computers
> > > (it's a home network setup with both computers sitting right next to
> each
> > > other with a switch between them, so I can guarantee that).  I'm using
> the
> > > same fstab options I normally use: hard, intr, rsize=8192, wsize=8192,
> tcp,
> > > nfsvers=3 .  But for whatever reason, I get this message whenever I
> try to
> > > mount the drive.
> > >
> > > On Mon, Apr 13, 2015 at 12:54 PM, Jason L Tibbitts III <tibbs at
> math.uh.edu>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > >> >>>>> "KM" == Kelly Miller <lightsolphoenix at gmail.com> writes:
> > >>
> > >> KM> I just tried to mount my home folders using NFS as I usually do,
> but
> > >> KM> no matter what I get the error mount.nfs: requested NFS version or
> > >> KM> transport protocol is not supported.  Did something change in the
> > >> KM> Alpha of Fedora 22 to suddenly break NFS mounting?  I've tried a
> > >> KM> bunch of mount options, but nothing seems to work.
> > >>
> > >> I know that a kernel update in Fedora 21 broke kerberized NFS4 export
> > >> (on the server) when selinux is enabled, but I'm guessing that's not
> > >> your issue.  Perhaps you could provide more details.
> > >>
> > >>  - J<
> > >>
> > >
> > >
> > -------------- next part --------------
> > An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20150414/ad02513b/attachment.html>