About making noarch package arch specific, when contents differ.

[Reindl Harald]

Am 01.08.2015 um 23:05 schrieb Florian Weimer:
> On 07/28/2015 06:59 PM, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
>> Actually, reproducable builds wrt. docs have been subject to Fedora
>> Packaging since Fedora day #1 and repeatedly have been subject to
>> discussions of details (e.g. doxygen repeatedly had introduced docs
>> breakages)
>>
>> Packages which do not comply to this rule are broken.
>
> Can you provide a citation in the guidelines?  As far as I can tell,
> javadoc hasn't been patched not to put the build date into the resulting
> HTML documentation, so a lot of Java packages are not compliant with the
> above

it's simply not true - there are no reproducable builds in Fedora and 
frankly currently very few distributions have them at all

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 181 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20150801/70f61f4f/attachment.sig>