Question about profile.d scripts definition in Spec file

[Marcin Haba]

On 02.08.2015 23:58, Jonathan Underwood wrote:
> On 2 August 2015 at 22:57, Jonathan Underwood
> <jonathan.underwood at gmail.com> wrote:
>> On 2 August 2015 at 15:29, Marcin Haba <marcin.haba at bacula.pl> wrote:
>>> My image of configuration files is that they are files for read/write
>>> purpose by design, because they enables _configure_ something
>>> (application, service, single program, script...whatever). If they are
>>> dedicated only for reading then from my point of view they lose
>>> "configuration" meaning (something like WORM storage ;-) ).
>>>
>>
>> This is probably an argument for having shell configuration fragments
>> packaged under /usr/lib/bash/profile.d rather than /etc/profile.d.
> 
> .. or /usr/share/bash/profile.d, perhaps.

Hello Jonathan,

That is also good idea, I think.
Thanks.

Best regards.
Marcin Haba


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 473 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20150803/d2869860/attachment.sig>