Question about profile.d scripts definition in Spec file

[Marcin Haba]

On 04.08.2015 19:38, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> On Mon, 3 Aug 2015 22:16:39 +0200, Marcin Haba wrote:
>>> Btw, rpmlint does not override Fedora's packaging guidelines:
>>> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Configuration_files
>>
>> Not override, but good when rpmlint follows on packaging guidelines as
>> much as possible and reasonable.
> 
> You could open a RFE in rpmlint upstream tracker.
> Or try to get Fedora's rpmlint to point at the packaging guidelines
> section instead of mentioning %config directly.

Thanks for the tip.
Your idea seems OK, however I am not sure if I really want go in this
direction.

Best regards.
Marcin Haba

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 473 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20150805/23d2089e/attachment.sig>