Is it time to allow Chromium in Fedora?

Reindl Harald h.reindl at thelounge.net
Tue Aug 11 19:39:48 UTC 2015



Am 11.08.2015 um 21:12 schrieb Chris Murphy:
> On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 12:41 PM, Gerald B. Cox <gbcox at bzb.us> wrote:
>> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:No_Bundled_Libraries
>
> Meanwhile, on OS X I was already given notification of Firefox being
> updated to 40.0.0 just a bit ago. And while I see Firefox 40.0 in
> koji, there are no Bodhi entries for it, so it's not in any repo.
>
> So I don't really buy any of the security arguments of either "no
> bundled libraries" or the FF exception to it

that's just a Fedora problem noticeable for a lot of critical updates 
not make it even to updates-testing while CentOS offers updated packages 
at the same time

it's not Firefox specific

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 181 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20150811/b8838da3/attachment.sig>


More information about the devel mailing list