Unable to submit update for F22 (was Re: bodhi 2 now live)

[Paul W. Frields]

On Thu, Aug 20, 2015 at 02:40:10PM -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Thu, 20 Aug 2015 22:24:18 +0200
> Kevin Kofler <kevin.kofler at chello.at> wrote:
> 
> > But this is a project where Fedora *is* upstream!
> 
> I assume you mean "bodhi" by "this". 
> 
> The primary bodhi developers are heavily involved in Fedora, but are
> also involved in other communities. When is a project "Fedora" ? 
> There are other installs of bodhi out in the world (at least there
> were) where we get contributions from. 

Right, considering Fedora as equivalent to the upstream here is
incorrect.  These projects are meant to be forkable to any project
(free or not), of which Fedora is only one.

> > One thing is the standards we require for being packaged in Fedora or
> > used in Fedora infrastructure. Another is what we expect from our
> > *own* projects. And there, requiring Fedora infrastructure to be used
> > is very reasonable.
> 
> Well, I guess we will agree to disagree then. 

Agreed with kfenzi.


-- 
Paul W. Frields                                http://paul.frields.org/
  gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233  5906 ACDB C937 BD11 3717
  http://redhat.com/   -  -  -  -   http://pfrields.fedorapeople.org/
    The open source story continues to grow: http://opensource.com