bodhi 2 now live

[Ralf Corsepius]

On 08/21/2015 04:03 PM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> On Fri, 21 Aug 2015 09:00:29 +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
>
>>> On 08/21/2015 08:34 AM, Till Hofmann wrote:
>>>> Also, it seems like I can revoke other people's updates. At least I
>>>> could press the 'Revoke' button and I received a confirmation
>>>> notification. Also, instead of the Revoke button, there is now a "Push
>>>> to Testing" and a "Push to Stable" button. But there is no comment that
>>>> the update has been revoked, so I'm not sure if it was revoked or not.
>>>
>>> The start page confirms that I revoked the torch-3.1-12.fc23 update:
>>> https://thofmann.fedorapeople.org/Screenshot%20from%202015-08-21%2008-42-52.png
>>>
>>> Ralf, sorry for messing with your update.
>>
>> Interesting - May be it's still in the process queue somewhere, but so
>> far, I haven't been notified about this, neither in BZ nor per email.
>> If you hadn't mentioned it, I'd not know about this incident.
>
> Fedora Notifications web site finds a notification about it:
>
>    7 hours ago thofmann revoked torch-3.1-12.fc23
Yes. This was the incident Till was referring to.

> Though, given that you are not the owner of the package,  I guess
> this has not been forwarded to you.
Correct - I acted as provenpackager, who stepped in to keep alive a 
package, whose maintainer likely is AWOL[1].

> It would be bodhi's responsibility
> to submit a notification that refers to the update ticket "owner", too.
Exactly. IMO, this is a bug in bodhi. I would expect the update 
"submitter" and the bugzilla-ticket owner, an update is referring to be 
notified (In this case: both me).

> And perhaps you're also affected by issues with the default Fedora
> Notifications filters I've encountered. This thread:
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2015-August/213609.html

I don't know - Possible. Due to the mass of notifications, I am 
receiving (100s - 1000s per day), I am filtering notifications and am 
moving most notifications to trash unread ;)

Ralf

[1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1240072