when DEP-3 compliant patches in Fedora?

[Björn Persson]

Marcin Juszkiewicz <mjuszkiewicz at redhat.com> wrote:
> Are there any plans on adding/enforcing such requirements at least for new
> patches? 
> 
> Maintainers are not the only persons who work on their packages. Sometimes some
> random developers go though random packages for several reasons (fixing ftbfs on
> secondary architectures, mass rebuilds etc). There is also "bus factor" which
> can wipe maintainer from existence or people just orphan own packages. 
> 
> Why we have to check patch after patch for their reason or upstream status?

Have you read the existent policy on this?
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Patch_Guidelines

Björn Persson
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signatur
URL: <http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20150828/2c078ed1/attachment.sig>