3 days without pushes ?

Stephen John Smoogen smooge at gmail.com
Thu Feb 12 20:07:16 UTC 2015

On 12 February 2015 at 12:53, Sérgio Basto <sergio at serjux.com> wrote:

> On Qui, 2015-02-12 at 14:41 -0500, Corey Sheldon wrote:
> > Aka patience and to be totally honest and blunt, if you have a
> > alpha/beta tester group and or a solid forum/mailing list with updates
> > to status this should seriously not be a setback  3 weeks on the other
> > hand might qualify.....Appreciate the eagerness to partake in
> > development /packaging but things happen from time to time learn to
> > roll with the tides as they say
> yeah, but we should have some regularity, I don't like waiting without
> knowing the delay, in this case is pushing to stable, is just for my
> organization, to see what is in stable and what let in testing, and I
> have been patient.

I realize we haven't have a branch in a while due to the long Fedora 20
cycle, but this is how things are done usually after a branch.. there can
be up to a week delay for pushes as various things get ironed out.

> But when someone else send a package to testing and I want test it, if
> we don't have a push to testing, force me download packages manually .
> The point here is push to testing should be more quickly than push to
> stable .
> Thanks ,
> --
> Sérgio M. B.
> --
> devel mailing list
> devel at lists.fedoraproject.org
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
> Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

Stephen J Smoogen.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20150212/6580f5f6/attachment.html>

More information about the devel mailing list