Mass Fortran rebuilds due to new GCC?
M. Edward (Ed) Borasky
znmeb at znmeb.net
Fri Feb 13 21:21:38 UTC 2015
I need FORTRAN for R and R packages - if it's not 100% for the R
ecosystme I'd consider any bugs to be at least blockers for beta, if
On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 12:59 PM, Björn Esser <bjoern.esser at gmail.com> wrote:
> Am Freitag, den 13.02.2015, 13:53 -0700 schrieb Kevin Fenzi:
>> On Fri, 13 Feb 2015 12:47:07 -0800
>> Susi Lehtola <jussilehtola at fedoraproject.org> wrote:
>> > Hi,
>> > as has happened many times before, the GCC bump in rawhide has broken
>> > all Fortran packages, desperately needing a mass rebuild.
>> Can you expand on the breakage? Is it that they no longer rebuild?
>> Or that they no longer run?
> I think, he's talking about the fact they are segfaulting… ;)
>> > Unfortunately, rpm is blissfully unaware of any breakage happening
>> > (BZ #1192617) so maintainers won't even know when this breakage
>> > happens.
>> > Before I start rebuilding packages, are there any plans to do the
>> > rebuilds soon..?
>> There is no mass rebuild this cycle. It would be good to isolate the
>> scope here and see what needs to be rebuilt. Do you have a list of all
>> affected packages or a way to come up with one?
> Why is mass rebuild skipped this time?
> For this particular case it is: repoquery --whatrequires libgfortran
> devel mailing list
> devel at lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
OSJourno: Robust Power Tools for Digital Journalists
Remember, if you're traveling to Bactria, Hump Day is Tuesday and Thursday.
More information about the devel